[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default number of overwrites in shred
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: Default number of overwrites in shred |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:42:28 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) |
HggdH wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 10:20 +0000, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> Thanks for performance testing, showing reading /dev/urandom is the
>>> bottleneck.
>> It would be worth knowing what CPU you used for this test.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Pádraig.
>
> An AMD64 Turion, 2 cores @ 2GHz. The disk interface is a SATA UDMA/133.
>
> Please keep in mind I have not yet run a real performance test (multiple
> runs, multiple file sizes).
Yes cache may bias the results somewhat, though /dev/urandom is surprisingly
slow:
$ dd bs=1M count=100 if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 23.3218 seconds, 4.5 MB/s
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/22
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/22
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/22
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, HggdH, 2009/01/23
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/25
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, HggdH, 2009/01/26
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/26
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, Pádraig Brady, 2009/01/26
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, HggdH, 2009/01/26
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred,
Pádraig Brady <=
- Re: Default number of overwrites in shred, HggdH, 2009/01/26