[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux
From: |
Giuseppe Scrivano |
Subject: |
Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jun 2009 13:55:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
> Actually, there may be a nice way to allow --pid=PID to
> integrate seamlessly with inotify support.
>
> I think you can add an IN_DELETE_SELF inotify watch on the "/proc/PID"
> directory. I suspect that every system with inotify support also
> has usable /proc/PID directories. The only requirement seems to be
> that the desired directory be readable.
I tried to watch /proc/$PID using inotify-tools and a few lines program
that I wrote ad-hoc and it seems I can't monitor /proc correctly.
I didn't receive IN_DELETE_SELF or any other message when the $PID
process was killed.
It seems I can't use inotify in this direct way to monitor processes
status.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, (continued)
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/13
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/14
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/15
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Pádraig Brady, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Pádraig Brady, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/06
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux,
Giuseppe Scrivano <=
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/07