[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in "sort -n -k1.4,1.2"
|
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
|
Subject: |
Re: bug in "sort -n -k1.4,1.2" |
|
Date: |
Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:30:27 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) |
Cliff Miller wrote:
>
> the non-trivial case here is when -b is present in the form
>
> sort -k2.1b,2.3
>
> where the start and end positions could be in either order depending
> on the number of blanks that start field 2.
Right, good point.
I've added a test for that case also and pushed the result.
cheers,
Pádraig.