[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0 |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:54:29 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) |
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 10/27/2009 1:39 AM:
>>>>>> env -0/--null
>>>>>> printenv -0/--null
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as a means of unambiguously representing the current contents of the
>>>>>> environment with NUL terminators instead of newlines?
>> Yes, now I'm in favor of this, too.
>
> This patch implements the option; I'm still working on developing a test
> (comparing binary output takes a bit more effort) before I will commit
> anything, but thought I'd at least get the review started.
>
> address@hidden output null-byte-terminated lines
Should that be NUL-byte ?
Otherwise it looks good.
thanks,
Pádraig.
- [RFC] {print,}env -0, Eric Blake, 2009/10/26
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Pádraig Brady, 2009/10/26
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/26
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Bauke Jan Douma, 2009/10/26
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/27
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Eric Blake, 2009/10/27
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0,
Pádraig Brady <=
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/27
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Eric Blake, 2009/10/27
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Pádraig Brady, 2009/10/28
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/28
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Eric Blake, 2009/10/28
- Re: [RFC] {print,}env -0, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/28