[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rm 8.1
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: rm 8.1 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:18:07 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> It depends on how worried you are about the likelihood of distros
> distributing unpatched coreutils 8.0 and 8.1 builds, and how worried you
> are about encountering it in the wild. In general, passing an empty file
> name to rm is never going to succeed, so there's already room for
> improvement in your scripts; so this could be the justification to make
> those changes.
Unless they use rm -f, where the error is supposed to be ignored.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: rm 8.1,
Andreas Schwab <=