[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rm - bug or user error?
From: |
Jon Stanley |
Subject: |
Re: rm - bug or user error? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:53:15 -0500 |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Michael Webb <address@hidden> wrote:
> I suspect the "No match" is coming from the command line parsing and not rm
> itself. However, the message starts with rm.
I would suspect you're right - I just tried on my Fedora 12 system
(coreuitls 7.6, which is not the current release) and got the expected
results:
address@hidden ~]$ mkdir test
address@hidden ~]$ cd test/
address@hidden test]$ ls
address@hidden test]$ mkdir dir1 dir2
address@hidden test]$ rm -rf dir1 dir2 f*
address@hidden test]$ ls -la
total 8
drwxrwxr-x. 2 jstanley jstanley 4096 2010-01-26 20:49 .
drwx------. 83 jstanley jstanley 4096 2010-01-26 20:49 ..
address@hidden test]$
What version of coreutils and what shell are you using, and on what
operating system?
- rm - bug or user error?, Michael Webb, 2010/01/26
- Re: rm - bug or user error?, Alan Curry, 2010/01/26
- Re: rm - bug or user error?,
Jon Stanley <=
- Message not available
- Re: rm - bug or user error?, Jon Stanley, 2010/01/26
- Re: rm - bug or user error?, Alan Curry, 2010/01/26
- Re: rm - bug or user error?, Bob Proulx, 2010/01/26
- Re: rm - bug or user error?, Eric Blake, 2010/01/26
- Re: rm - bug or user error?, Michael Webb, 2010/01/26
Re: rm - bug or user error?, Eric Blake, 2010/01/26