[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion for rm(1)
From: |
Phillip Susi |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion for rm(1) |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:06:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 3/11/2010 7:37 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Incidentally, due to the increasing use of SSD and their tendency not to
> reuse recently used blocks it may become again easier in future to
> recover data.
Actually once TRIM support becomes common recovering deleted files on
SSD will be impossible since the flash blocks will be erased rather than
just being left unallocated.
I think the man page should changed to state that the file *MAY* be
recoverable using forensics. That should be sufficiently clear that it
is not a secure erase, but recovery is not at all easy if it is possible
at all.
- RE: Suggestion for rm(1), (continued)
- RE: Suggestion for rm(1), Voelker, Bernhard, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Keisial, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Eric Blake, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Reuben Thomas, 2010/03/12
- [PATCH] rm: tweak wording about loss of data warning, Eric Blake, 2010/03/17
- Re: [PATCH] rm: tweak wording about loss of data warning, Eric Blake, 2010/03/18
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Bob Proulx, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Bob Proulx, 2010/03/10
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Andreas Schwab, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1), Bob Proulx, 2010/03/11
- Re: Suggestion for rm(1),
Phillip Susi <=