[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort
From: |
Chen Guo |
Subject: |
bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 02:22:58 -0800 |
Hi Professor Eggert,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> (for i in $(seq 12); do read line; echo $i; sleep .1; done
> cat > /dev/null) < fifo &
> (ulimit -t 1; ./sort in > fifo \
> || echo killed via $(env kill -l $(expr $? - 128)))
I ran this 10 times or so on an i7 and couldn't trigger anything. Is
seq 12 supposed to vary depending on the number of cores?
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Chen Guo, 2010/12/01
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/01
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort,
Chen Guo <=
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/02
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Jim Meyering, 2010/12/02
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Chen Guo, 2010/12/03
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/03
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Chen Guo, 2010/12/06
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/06
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Chen Guo, 2010/12/06
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Jim Meyering, 2010/12/07
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Jim Meyering, 2010/12/07
- bug#7489: [coreutils] over aggressive threads in sort, Chen Guo, 2010/12/07