bug#15127: grep not taking last conflicting option as choice?

[Linda Walsh]

Eric Blake wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
> > Isn't the point of software to give users the freedom
> > to make their choices -- to help them do their job?  It's not to enforce
> > a particular mind-think or dogma.
>
> And the point of free software is that YOU are free to modify the
> software to fit your needs, and share your modifications;
----
Oh, so if I submit patches to fix the problems I've raised, they
will be incorporated?  Or is someone using their position of
source-code maintainer/gatekeeper to implement their own
vision while excluding others?

 not to rant
> that you got something at no price while demanding that someone else fix
> it to meet your whims.  Share patches, rather than rants, and you will
> gain a lot more friends in the world of free software. 
----
        I have shared multiple patches -- having them dropped on the floor
makes me unwilling to submit patches for things that they gatekeepers are
going to unilaterally reject anyway.


> More than 50% of your mail was ranting about the behavior of grep, which
> we already established is NOT part of the coreutils package.
----
    Sorry, I thought the 15127 was the bug that got assigned when I
send the email to the bug-grep reported here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-grep/2013-08/msg00017.html

and responded to here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-grep/2013-08/msg00018.html

It doesn't seem that the grep bug was assigned a bug number, though it
appeared to be rejected and my response was in regards to it.