bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#16075: ls/stat-free-color.sh fails on AArch64 architecture


From: Bernhard Voelker
Subject: bug#16075: ls/stat-free-color.sh fails on AArch64 architecture
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:58:25 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5

On 12/06/2013 06:45 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 05:20 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> That would probably work, though perhaps we should
>> make this test a bit more general with something like the following?
>>
>> Also Marcin, could you try out the latest snapshot (which will
>> also need the patch applied). It has another aarch64 specific patch included,
>> and it would be great to verify it on this platform.
>> Two birds with one stone and all that. Simple test instructions at:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2013-12/msg00062.html
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/ls/stat-free-color.sh b/tests/ls/stat-free-color.sh
>> index 3aacf96..4dd7ae7 100755
>> --- a/tests/ls/stat-free-color.sh
>> +++ b/tests/ls/stat-free-color.sh
>> @@ -53,11 +53,11 @@ eval $(dircolors -b color-without-stat)
>>  # To avoid counting those, first get a baseline count by running
>>  # ls with only the --help option.  Then, compare that with the
>>  # invocation under test.
>> -strace -o log-help -e stat,lstat,stat64,lstat64 ls --help >/dev/null || 
>> fail=1
>> -n_lines_help=$(wc -l < log-help)
>> +strace -o log-help ls --help >/dev/null || fail=1
>> +n_lines_help=$(grep 'stat.*(' log-help | wc -l)
>>
>> -strace -o log -e stat,lstat,stat64,lstat64 ls --color=always . || fail=1
>> -n_lines=$(wc -l < log)
>> +strace -o log ls --color=always . || fail=1
>> +n_lines=$(grep 'stat.*(' log | wc -l)
>>
>>  n_stat=$(expr $n_lines - $n_lines_help)

I think that's okay (and much better than my on-the-spot fix),
and Marcin already gave positive feedback.

> Even at that the test is still brittle,
> as the guard only checks that `strace -e stat` works.
> Also it's conceivable that on some edge cases there
> may be more than one stat call used in this case.

I must confess that I don't understand this, i.e. in which circumstances
this test would fail as it has been working long enough, and now just
is ported to another architecture.

Have a nice day,
Berny





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]