[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16803: @kbd for long option names?
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
bug#16803: @kbd for long option names? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:57:28 GMT |
I just realized that, at some point, the coreutils manual started using
@kbd for long option names, as in:
@item -b
@itemx @address@hidden@var{method}]}
Why? Semantically, long option names are not keyboard input.
Practically, I find the result pretty suboptimal in the printed output,
at least, since the -b is typeset in upright typewriter and --backup in
slanted typewriter, even though they are synonyms.
I'm happy to send a patch to remove all the @kbd's if you'll accept it,
but I imagine you had a reason to insert them in the first place.
Surely I didn't use them when I translated some of the original
descriptions?! Can't say I remember [anything] with 100% certainty :).
karl
- bug#16803: @kbd for long option names?,
Karl Berry <=