[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#17904: issue with split command
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
bug#17904: issue with split command |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jul 2014 08:13:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
tags 17904 + moreinfo
stop
On 07/02/2014 11:16 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using split command to split a large file and later I am renaming file.
> PFB command.
>
> find . -size +1000 -exec split -l 10000 {\} {}-new \;
> find . -type f -name "*new*" -exec mv "{}" "{}".list \;
>
> However, this is giving correct result sometimes and other times :
> while creating files, the file with name ending newaa is missing .(This would
> be the first file output while splitting)
Thanks for the bug report.
However, TBH I don't see a problem here (... other than later file
names possibly clashing the earlier produced "*new*" files; I reported
that to the main coreutils list separately).
> For ex:
> If I split a file named "sample" of size 1100 KB and with 25000 lines. If I
> run the above query:
>
> Sometimes the result is:
Can you please explain what you mean by "sometimes" here?
Is this related to certain files (where you could reproduce with
a standalone "split -l 10000 file file-new" run)?
> Samplenewaa.list
> Samplenewab.list
> Samplenewac.list
>
> But other times,only:
> Samplenewab.list
> Samplenewac.list
>
> Can you please look into this and let me know if this is a bug or if I am
> doing something wrong.
>
> Thank You,
Can you please try to narrow the test case down to the file where
the "aa" file is missing? Both split(1) and mv(1) have the --verbose
option which could help finding the cause.
Thanks & have a nice day,
Berny