bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#20733: coreutils build problem


From: Michael Felt
Subject: bug#20733: coreutils build problem
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 04:54:02 +0200

I assume the error is mine, but I do not understand what.

After automake and autoconf (just to be sure) make wants to call "missing", but that does not succeed.


CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh /data/prj/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-8.23.211-b1d1a/build-aux/missing aclocal-1.15 -I m4
aclocal-1.15: error: echo failed with exit status: 1
make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1
address@hidden:[/data/prj/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-8.23.211-b1d1a]1d1a/build-aux/missing aclocal-1.15 -I m4           <
aclocal-1.15: error: echo failed with exit status: 1

ran by hand - as /bin/sh -x ...

address@hidden:[/data/prj/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-8.23.211-b1d1a]/bin/sh -x /data/prj/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-8.23.21>
+ scriptversion=2013-10-28.13
+ test 3 -eq 0
+ aclocal-1.15 -I m4
aclocal-1.15: error: echo failed with exit status: 1
+ st=1
+ test 1 -eq 0
+ test 1 -eq 63
+ test 1 -eq 127
+ exit 1


On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
On 05/06/15 20:27, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 11:53 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 05/06/15 17:02, Michael Felt wrote:
>>>> Attribute "constructor" is not supported
>>
>> Does the attached patch help?
>>
>
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -455,7 +455,11 @@ if test $gl_cv_list_mounted_fs = yes && test $gl_cv_fs_space = yes; then
>>  fi
>>
>>  AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether this is system supports stdbuf])
>> -AC_COMPILE_IFELSE(
>> +ac_save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
>> +# Build with -Werror to detect warnings about
>> +# about ignored "constructor" arguments.
>> +CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Werror"
>
> -Werror works for gcc and some other compilers like clang, but is not
> universal to all compilers.  Are you sure that it is the right flag to
> be adding for the duration of this test?

Yes good point.

Also it's best only worry about warnings when cross compiling,
as otherwise we're using a direct runtime check.
Updated patch is attached.

thanks,
Pádraig.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]