bug#22087: Problem with stdbuf configure test for 8.24 on Solaris with Studio C compiler.

[Bob Proulx]

Eric Blake wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Or is a return 0 already defaulted?  It stood out to me that the
> > previous return was unconditional and without an else or a
> > fallthrough this is a change from the previous control flow.
> > 
> >   -    return !(stdbuf == 1);]])
> >   +    if (stdbuf != 1)
> >   +      return 1;
> >   +    return 0;]])
> 
> Explicitly listing 'return 0;' here would result in a doubled-up return
> 0 in the overall conftest.c file.

Gotcha!  That there is already a default return 0 answers my question.

Thanks,
Bob