|
From: | Assaf Gordon |
Subject: | bug#34345: |
Date: | Sat, 9 Feb 2019 13:33:43 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 2019-02-09 1:18 p.m., Ricky Tigg wrote:
Covered object by values '1994 s', '2014.25 s' seems to be a unique time elapsed. Those values can therefore be expected to be identical, either '1994 s' or '2014.25 s' – 2014 s and 25 hundredths of s –.
The command was:
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc status=progress > 8003555840 bytes (8.0 GB, 7.5 GiB) copied, 1994 s, 4.0 MB/s> dd:writing to '/dev/sdc': No space left on device> 15638481+0 records in> 15638480+0 records out> 8006901760 bytes (8.0 GB, 7.5 GiB) copied, 2014.25 s, 4.0 MB/s
The first status report (with 1994s) is printed due to "status=progress" and is updated periodically. The last status line (with 2014.25s) was printed about 20 seconds later, hence the time difference.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |