[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
Subject: |
bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils |
Date: |
Fri, 03 May 2019 18:24:09 +0200 |
On Friday, May 3, 2019 5:56:35 PM CEST Viktors Berstis wrote:
> I don't think the problem has anything to do with sorting or -U1.
It was unclear what you meant by "the problem" so I pointed out the only
inefficiency that was immediately obvious to me.
> When ls is taking over 5 minutes for something that should run in a
> couple of seconds, the task manager shows that it is using nearly no
> CPU.... it is doing a lot of "other I/O".
You can try to use some profiling/tracing tools to debug the root cause.
> It doesn't look like the build you referenced is designed to be
> compileable for Windows. Is there one that is? Thanks.
I would suggest to build the latest upstream release (coreutils-8.31 now)
from:
https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/
Kamil
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Viktors Berstis, 2019/05/01
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Kamil Dudka, 2019/05/02
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Viktors Berstis, 2019/05/02
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Paul Eggert, 2019/05/02
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Viktors Berstis, 2019/05/02
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Paul Eggert, 2019/05/02
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Viktors Berstis, 2019/05/02
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Kamil Dudka, 2019/05/03
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Viktors Berstis, 2019/05/03
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils,
Kamil Dudka <=
- bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, Paul Eggert, 2019/05/03
bug#35531: problem with ls in coreutils, L A Walsh, 2019/05/04