bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#64123: "stat -f -c '%T' ." on alpha fails with EOVERFLOW with NFS


From: matoro
Subject: bug#64123: "stat -f -c '%T' ." on alpha fails with EOVERFLOW with NFS
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 15:53:53 -0400

On 2023-06-17 15:23, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2023-06-17 10:30, Pádraig Brady wrote:
I see that s390 and alpha are the only 64 bit architectures
that have a 32-bit ino_t for example, which may cause issues within glibc?

Weird.

What happens if you compile with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64? Does this cause alpha to have a 64-bit ino_t? (How does that work, exactly?) If so, then AC_SYS_LARGEFILE should check for this and should arrange for "#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64".

Matoro, what happens if you compile the following C program?


#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int
main (void)
{
  int n = sizeof (ino_t);
  printf ("%d\n", n);
}


Compile and run it like this:

gcc ino.c
./a.out
gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 ino.c
./a.out

If the former prints "4" and the latter "8" then we can fix Autoconf and Gnulib AC_SYS_LARGEFILE to do the right thing.

Also, as Pádraig suggests, the output of the following shell command would be useful:

strace stat -f -c '%T' .

Also please see <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1899582>. Although it's about s390x I expect there are similar issues on alpha, which may not be fixed and if so it's not a coreutils issue per se.

This indeed seems to be the issue, thank you. Compiling with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 fixes the problem.

For reference, here is the additional requested information.

strace:  https://paste.matoro.tk/o1te2ek
config.h:  https://paste.matoro.tk/93xerfg

Thank you for your help!





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]