bug-cpio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-cpio] [PATCH v4 0/3] initramfs: add support for xattrs in the i


From: Mimi Zohar
Subject: Re: [Bug-cpio] [PATCH v4 0/3] initramfs: add support for xattrs in the initial ram disk
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 10:31:25 -0400

On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 16:42 +0300, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 6/30/2019 6:39 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 10:15 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >> On 6/3/2019 8:32 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> >>> On 6/3/19 4:31 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >>>>> This patch set aims at solving the following use case: appraise files 
> >>>>> from
> >>>>> the initial ram disk. To do that, IMA checks the signature/hash from the
> >>>>> security.ima xattr. Unfortunately, this use case cannot be implemented
> >>>>> currently, as the CPIO format does not support xattrs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This proposal consists in including file metadata as additional files 
> >>>>> named
> >>>>> METADATA!!!, for each file added to the ram disk. The CPIO parser in the
> >>>>> kernel recognizes these special files from the file name, and calls the
> >>>>> appropriate parser to add metadata to the previously extracted file. It 
> >>>>> has
> >>>>> been proposed to use bit 17:16 of the file mode as a way to recognize 
> >>>>> files
> >>>>> with metadata, but both the kernel and the cpio tool declare the file 
> >>>>> mode
> >>>>> as unsigned short.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any opinion on this patch set?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Roberto
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, I've had the window open since you posted it but haven't gotten 
> >>> around to
> >>> it. I'll try to build it later today.
> >>>
> >>> It does look interesting, and I have no objections to the basic approach. 
> >>> I
> >>> should be able to add support to toybox cpio over a weekend once I've got 
> >>> the
> >>> kernel doing it to test against.
> >>
> >> Ok.
> >>
> >> Let me give some instructions so that people can test this patch set.
> >>
> >> To add xattrs to the ram disk embedded in the kernel it is sufficient
> >> to set CONFIG_INITRAMFS_FILE_METADATA="xattr" and
> >> CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE="<file with xattr>" in the kernel configuration.
> >>
> >> To add xattrs to the external ram disk, it is necessary to patch cpio:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/euleros/cpio/commit/531cabc88e9ecdc3231fad6e4856869baa9a91ef
> >> (xattr-v1 branch)
> >>
> >> and dracut:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/euleros/dracut/commit/a2dee56ea80495c2c1871bc73186f7b00dc8bf3b
> >> (digest-lists branch)
> >>
> >> The same modification can be done for mkinitramfs (add '-e xattr' to the
> >> cpio command line).
> >>
> >> To simplify the test, it would be sufficient to replace only the cpio
> >> binary and the dracut script with the modified versions. For dracut, the
> >> patch should be applied to the local dracut (after it has been renamed
> >> to dracut.sh).
> >>
> >> Then, run:
> >>
> >> dracut -e xattr -I <file with xattr> (add -f to overwrite the ram disk)
> >>
> >> Xattrs can be seen by stopping the boot process for example by adding
> >> rd.break to the kernel command line.
> > 
> > A simple way of testing, without needing any changes other than the
> > kernel patches, is to save the dracut temporary directory by supplying
> > "--keep" on the dracut command line, calling
> > usr/gen_initramfs_list.sh, followed by usr/gen_init_cpio with the "-e
> > xattr" option.
> 
> Alternatively, follow the instructions to create the embedded ram disk
> with xattrs, and use the existing external ram disk created with dracut
> to check if xattrs are created.

True, but this alternative is for those who normally use dracut to
create an initramfs, but don't want to update cpio or dracut.

Mimi




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]