[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Memory leak a "fix" for stable tree?
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
Subject: |
Memory leak a "fix" for stable tree? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:11:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 |
Hey all,
Just wondering if anyone had an opinion on this. I have a six or seven
line fix for a memory leak (usually only a few bytes leak, and not more
than what has already been allocated for argv) that I'm getting ready to
commit to the feature branch. Is that a valid fix for the stable tree,
or are we only fixing errors that cause user-perceivable problems there?
Derek
--
*8^)
Email: derek@ximbiot.com
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
--
You seem... to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all
constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would
place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.... The Constitution has erected
no such single tribunal.
- Thomas Jefferson, 1820
- Memory leak a "fix" for stable tree?,
Derek Robert Price <=