[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dose GDB support Fortran Cods?
From: |
Wu Zhou |
Subject: |
Re: Dose GDB support Fortran Cods? |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:49:46 +0800 (CST) |
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Aug 7, 2005, at 10:06 PM, Wu Zhou wrote:
>
> >
> > > command line,I use "gdb test",then I enter "list",but screen displays:
> > >
> > > 1 ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S: No such file or directory.
> > > in ../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S
> >
> > This is a bug in GDB, we ever discussed a similar problem in:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2005-07/msg00228.html.
> >
> > BTW: there will be more chance you gdb/fortran problems get answered if
> > you ask in address@hidden or address@hidden It seems that
> > few people read address@hidden :-)
>
> Actually it is really a bug in GCC for not emitting DW_AT_entry_point
> (dwarf-2) or N_MAIN (stabs), see PR 23280 which I just filed. (I thought
> there was already a bug filed but I could only find one for GCJ/java).
OK. I am not that sure about how gdb handle that. Daniel ever told me
that we can fix this in gdb's side by setting the main function to
"MAIN__" for Fortran programs.
It seems to me that emitting DW_AT_entry_point in gcc's side is a better
idea. But I am not sure whether gdb could handle it. When gcc do emit
DW_AT_entry_point, I will verify that. I had added myself into the
cc-list.
Regards
- Wu Zhou
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Dose GDB support Fortran Cods?,
Wu Zhou <=