bug-glibc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: writev is "unfair".


From: Sebastian Wilhelmi
Subject: Re: writev is "unfair".
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:28:46 +0100

Hi Andreas,

> > It is against CVS libc, but not
> > fully tested, as CVS libc does not compile on my system (name-config.h
> > missing, once that is fixed sysdeps/unix/i386/fork.S refuses to compile,
> > maybe because of gcc-2.95.2)
>
> Which binutils version?  gcc 2.95.2 should be fine - and works for me
> without problems.  That problem seems to be elsewhere.

$ dpkg -l | grep binutils
ii  binutils       2.10.1.0.2-1   The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
$ dpkg -l | grep gcc
ii  gcc            2.95.2-18      The GNU C compiler.

The exact error is:

make  -C posix subdir_lib
gcc ../sysdeps/unix/i386/fork.S -c /* lots of -I ommited */ D_LIBC_REENTRANT \
-include ../include/libc-symbols.h -DPIC -DSHARED   -DASSEMBLER  -DGAS_SYNTAX
\
-o fork.os

/tmp/ccJxP3Hs.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccJxP3Hs.s:1242: Error: local label "0" (instance number 1 of a fb label)
is not defined

Bye,
Sebastian
-- 
Sebastian Wilhelmi
mailto:address@hidden
http://goethe.ira.uka.de/~wilhelmi



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]