[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Q: ld-linux.2 bug in glibc2.2.2?

From: Andreas Jaeger
Subject: Re: Q: ld-linux.2 bug in glibc2.2.2?
Date: 27 Feb 2001 09:55:16 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands)

Basile STARYNKEVITCH <address@hidden> writes:

> >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Jaeger <address@hidden> writes:
>     Andreas> Basile STARYNKEVITCH <address@hidden>
>     Andreas> writes:
>     Andreas> If your binary is broken, it's a bug in your binary and
>     Andreas> we will not fix it - we can't check each and every
>     Andreas> access.
> Well, I have no warning or error message. Neither from ld not from the
> dynamic linker. I would expect that ld-linux.2 should be able to run
> an ELF executable -very similar to gcc produced ones- for which
> /usr/bin/ld does not give any error or warning. The ldscript I use
> contains all the sections from /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf_i386.x 

You might hit a bug - but without a description it's not possible to

> I feel that my binary is unorthodox but not broken. I am not sure of
> it. (but I do not know well all specific requirements of Linux ELF. In
> particular the role and place of the .note.run-ABI section).
> Is the number (or indexes) of PT_LOAD-ed segments hardwired in the
> ld-linux.so.2 code? I do not think it is....

I don't think so but check the elf subdir,

 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs address@hidden
   private address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]