RE: Problem compiling glibc with gcc 2.95.3

[David Korn]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Phil Edwards [mailto:address@hidden
>Sent: 20 March 2001 15:16

>In retrospect
>I wonder why glibc didn't use the "public interface," as it 
>were, of -E.

  D'oh.  I *knew* there was one more solution I had thought of and then
forgotten while I was writing the mail.  I wonder if it's because they
don't want all the system dependent pre-defines from the spec file?

     DaveK
-- 
 All your base are belong to us!


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************