[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Not a bug but...
From: |
Rainer Mager |
Subject: |
Not a bug but... |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:22:04 +0900 |
I don't think this is a bug but I figured it was worth asking...
I just installed 2.2.2 and noticed that libc.x.y.z.so is signifcantly
smaller than previous versions. Everything appears to be working fine. Is
that correct? Why is it so much smaller?
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4101324 Mar 1 2000 /lib/libc-2.1.3.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4828950 Jan 25 12:38 /lib/libc-2.2.1.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1389525 Mar 29 08:18 /lib/libc-2.2.2.so
--Rainer
- glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Not a bug but...,
Rainer Mager <=
- Re: Not a bug but..., Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/29
- RE: Not a bug but..., Rainer Mager, 2001/03/29
- Re: Not a bug but..., Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/29