Re: usleep() bug

[Michael Kerrisk]

> "Michael Kerrisk" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Another question, this time relating to usleep().  This function is
> > defined as returning void (sysdeps/unix/{sysv/linux,bsd}/usleep.c,
> > however SUSv2 and Austin draft 5 define this usleep as return int (-1 on
> > error, 0 on success) just as nanosleep() (on which usleep is implemented
> > in linux) does.  Is this considered a bug?
> 
> You are looking at an old version.  This is already changed in 2.2.2.

Thanks for the info - I was looking at 2.2.1. 

Cheers

Michael
__________________________________________
Michael Kerrisk
mailto: address@hidden

Shyness is more about censoring oneself than receiving censure.