Re: GLIBC 2.2.4 ?

[Frédéric L . W . Meunier]

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 12:05:05PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Frédéric L. W. Meunier <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > 
> >> We have no date - and we do not know whether it will address
> >> the GCC 3.0 issues since those are rather complex.
> > 
> > And what about your GCC patch for atexit ? Will it be
> > included in GCC 2.95.4 CVS ?
> 
> You mean this one?  That will be in 2.95.4.
> 
> 2001-04-03  Bernd Schmidt  <address@hidden>
> 
>       2001-03-16  Jakub Jelinek  <address@hidden>
>       * crtstuff.c (init_dummy): Use CRT_END_INIT_DUMMY if defined.
>       Remove ia32 linux PIC kludge and move it...
>       * config/i386/linux.h (CRT_END_INIT_DUMMY): ...here.

No. This patch is in CVS. I'm talking about the second patch.

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2001-07/msg00002.html

"I believe they have the atexit patch, it is in CVS after all.
Dunno about the __dso_handle exporting patch without which
atexit won't work properly."

Do I really need the second patch ? There are distributions
using GCC 2.95.3 + glibc 2.2.3 without it. An example is
Slackware 8.0.

-- 
address@hidden, {dyndns.}org} Tel: 55-21-2717-2399 (Niterói-RJ BR)