[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
What about _FPU_IEEE?
|
From: |
Richard B. Kreckel |
|
Subject: |
What about _FPU_IEEE? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:24:08 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi,
When trying to port something to Linux/PA I discovered that fpu_control.h
does not define _FPU_IEEE there. I guess this is because _FPU_DEFAULT is
just as good there? I need to set __fpu_control to _FPU_IEEE. What is
the suggested strategy on glibc? Just use _FPU_DEFAULT if _FPU_IEEE is
not defined? Is this going to give me the expected behaviour on all
architectures?
TIA
-rbk.
--
Richard B. Kreckel
<address@hidden>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>
- What about _FPU_IEEE?,
Richard B. Kreckel <=