bug-glibc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Don't have widec.h


From: Andreas Jaeger
Subject: Re: Don't have widec.h
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:17:56 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux)

Frank Schafer <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I did a custom build of glibc-2.2.4. with gcc-2.95.3 ( patched for
> glibc2 ).
>
> GCC configuration for the glibc-build:
>
> # ../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-languages=c,c++
> --disable-nls --disable-shared --enable-threads=posix
> # make BOOT_LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
>
> GLIBC configuration:
>
> # # unpacking the glibc-linuxthreads addon
> # ../glibc-2.2.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-add-ons
> --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu

Did you run make install?

> The configuration for the final GCC build went like this:
>
> # ../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/usr
> --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ --enable-threads \
>> --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,objc
> # make bootstrap
>
> ( The last shouldn't be of interest here - of course. )
>
> I'm missing the file `wchar.h` on my system, and thus I'm missing all
> the `wcs*` functions.
> I see all this in `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs` ( function definitions and
> `wchar.h` ).
>
> Can anyone tell me, why this don't get installed with the above
> configuration ( Or have we another nasty

<wchar.h> gets installed by glibc's make install.  If not, something
else is broken in your glibc installation.

> GCC - GLIBC incompatibility like the `atof()` one ( ficed by the patch )
> ? )

Nope.

> Is there a mailing list for GLIBC ?

This one for example ;-)
>
> Excuse, I can't run `glibcbug` because I prefer `vi` over `emacs`, thus
> haven't `emacs` installed.

Run next time:
EDITOR=vi glibcbug

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs address@hidden
   private address@hidden
    http://www.suse.de/~aj



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]