bug-glibc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Don't have widec.h


From: Frank Schafer
Subject: Re: Don't have widec.h
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 12:24:36 +0100

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> Frank Schafer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did a custom build of glibc-2.2.4. with gcc-2.95.3 ( patched for
> > glibc2 ).

> > # # unpacking the glibc-linuxthreads addon
> > # ../glibc-2.2.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-add-ons
> > --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> Did you run make install?

Of course.

> > I see all this in `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs` ( function definitions and
> > `wchar.h` ).
> >
> > Can anyone tell me, why this don't get installed with the above
> > configuration ( Or have we another nasty
>
> <wchar.h> gets installed by glibc's make install.  If not, something
> else is broken in your glibc installation.

What a glibc INSTALLATION??? I don't have one ( thats why I build it ;o)
The build went on a fresh machine with only static binaries ( gcc, binutils
... ).
In `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs/Depend`  I found "localedata". Does this mean
INSTALLED localedata?
Or better: Will I have to build glibc twice in such a case?

>
> > Is there a mailing list for GLIBC ?
>
> This one for example ;-)

Thanks, already found and subscribed to it.

> > Excuse, I can't run `glibcbug` because I prefer `vi` over `emacs`, thus
> > haven't `emacs` installed.
>
> Run next time:
> EDITOR=vi glibcbug

Thanks for the hint.

>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger
>   SuSE Labs address@hidden
>    private address@hidden
>     http://www.suse.de/~aj

Frank

Attachment: frank.schafer.vcf
Description: Card for Frank Schafer


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]