Re: Don't have widec.h

[Andreas Jaeger]

Frank Schafer <address@hidden> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Frank Schafer <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I did a custom build of glibc-2.2.4. with gcc-2.95.3 ( patched for
>> > glibc2 ).
>
>> > # # unpacking the glibc-linuxthreads addon
>> > # ../glibc-2.2.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-add-ons
>> > --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
>>
>> Did you run make install?
>
> Of course.
>
>> > I see all this in `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs` ( function definitions and
>> > `wchar.h` ).
>> >
>> > Can anyone tell me, why this don't get installed with the above
>> > configuration ( Or have we another nasty
>>
>> <wchar.h> gets installed by glibc's make install.  If not, something
>> else is broken in your glibc installation.
>
> What a glibc INSTALLATION??? I don't have one ( thats why I build it ;o)
> The build went on a fresh machine with only static binaries ( gcc, binutils
> ... ).

After make install of glibc, you have /usr/include/wchar.h if not,
you've made a mistake.

> In `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs/Depend`  I found "localedata". Does this mean
> INSTALLED localedata?

No.

> Or better: Will I have to build glibc twice in such a case?

No.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs address@hidden
   private address@hidden
    http://www.suse.de/~aj