Re: Don't have widec.h

[Frank Schafer]

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> Frank Schafer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> >> Frank Schafer <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I did a custom build of glibc-2.2.4. with gcc-2.95.3 ( patched for
> >> > glibc2 ).
> >
> >> > # # unpacking the glibc-linuxthreads addon
> >> > # ../glibc-2.2.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-add-ons
> >> > --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> >>
> >> Did you run make install?
> >
> > Of course.
> >
> >> > I see all this in `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs` ( function definitions and
> >> > `wchar.h` ).
> >> >
> >> > Can anyone tell me, why this don't get installed with the above
> >> > configuration ( Or have we another nasty
> >>
> >> <wchar.h> gets installed by glibc's make install.  If not, something
> >> else is broken in your glibc installation.
> >
> > What a glibc INSTALLATION??? I don't have one ( thats why I build it ;o)
> > The build went on a fresh machine with only static binaries ( gcc, binutils
> > ... ).
>
> After make install of glibc, you have /usr/include/wchar.h if not,
> you've made a mistake.
>
> > In `glibc-2.2.4/wcsmbs/Depend`  I found "localedata". Does this mean
> > INSTALLED localedata?
>
> No.
>
> > Or better: Will I have to build glibc twice in such a case?
>
> No.
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger
>   SuSE Labs address@hidden
>    private address@hidden
>     http://www.suse.de/~aj

ok,

maybe a typo. So let's try again

Thanks
Frank

frank.schafer.vcf
Description: Card for Frank Schafer