bug-glibc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gcc-3.0.3 fails to build glibc-2.2.5, or whatever


From: Andreas Jaeger
Subject: Re: gcc-3.0.3 fails to build glibc-2.2.5, or whatever
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:46:56 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux)

Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:

> "  Andreas Jaeger wrote:"
>> 
>> Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > "  Andreas Jaeger wrote:"
>> >> 
>> >> Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> >         Additional info: gcc-3.0.2 also fails the build.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> GCC 3.0.2 is known to be broken and should not be used with glibc,
>> >    it just shows that the problem doesnt depend on gcc
>> > requested info (possibly sent twice):
>> >
>> > GNU C Library stable release version 2.2.4, by Roland McGrath et al.
>> > Copyright (C) 1992-1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
>> > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
>> > PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>> > Compiled by GNU CC version 3.0.3.
>> 
>> You compiled glibc 2.2.4 with GCC 3.0.3.  This does not work at all as
>> mentioned in the release notes of glibc.  Only glibc 2.2.5 and newer
>> can be build with GCC 3.0.3 and newer.  Any older release will not
>> work.
>
>       I`m originally having problems with building glibc-2.2.5 with 3.0.3,
>     and 2.2.5 is announced as gcc-3 compatible.

The announcement mentioned that 2.2.5 can be compiled with 2.2.5.

>       No wonder i`m runnning 2.2.4, since i was unable to build 2.2.5.

You compiled 2.2.4 it with a GCC 3 compiler - that's the problem!

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs address@hidden
   private address@hidden
    http://www.suse.de/~aj



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]