[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc 2.2.5
Re: glibc 2.2.5
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:10:58 +0200
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence, i386-suse-linux)
Hactar <address@hidden> writes:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Hactar <address@hidden> writes:
>> > Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> >> address@hidden writes:
>> >> > I finished compiling and installing gcc and glibc. Now I can't execute
>> >> > any dynamic binaries.
>> >> > I've got
>> >> >
>> >> > /lib/libc.so.6 -> /usr/local/lib/libc-2.2.5.so
>> >> > /lib/ld-linux.so -> /usr/local/lib/ld-2.2.5.so
>> >> > /usr/local/lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.2.5.so
>> >> Everything that'S in usr/local should be linked...
> You mean the originals should be in /, or in /usr? /usr's inaccessible,
> early in the boot sequence. I suppose I could populate /usr with a
> skeleton set of libs, then mount the real /usr over it. Don't know how
> ld.so would deal with that.
Installing with --prefix=/usr puts the essential libs in /lib which
should be accessabel. Check the layout with make install
>> >> You've broken your installation since /lib/ld-linux.so.2 is hardcode
>> >> into each binary.
>> >> I strongly suggest to remove that broken
>> >> installation and start with --prefix=/usr
>> > How do you propose I should uninstall the erroneous installation?
>> rm -rf - after fixing the links first.
> A. Well, if I delete the files first, can it get worse than it is now?
I don't know how your setup is, it might be.
> B. You mean, place links where the files are now, to where they're going
> to be?
> C. Where should the originals and links be?
Sorry, I can't help further. This highly depends on what you've done.
>> You might need to reinstall via a different setup...
> 'ldconfig' is statically linked. I have a statically-linked 'mv' and
> emergency disks, which presumably contain 'mv', 'ls', etc. Is there a
> web site I can go to which has approximate recovery procedures? If it's
> only that it would take a long time, that's OK.
>> Updating glibc is really not that easy...
> Yeah, I'm finding out; there are lots of ways to mess up...
>> Please ask for further help on the mailing lists!
> I sent an identical message to the mailing list as soon as I realized my
> mistake (<1 minute). Unfamiliar mail client; I hit "reply to sender"
> instead of "reply to all". Oops.
SuSE Labs address@hidden
Re: glibc 2.2.5, Hactar, 2002/04/21
Re: glibc 2.2.5, Hactar, 2002/04/22