[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sreeji K Das
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:07:45 +0100 (BST)
I was under the impression the bug is due to the wrong
statfs() in libc. Am I wrong here ? Can you help me
see the light ? If I'm to report the bug to Redhat
(who's the vendor), am I to say it's a libc bug ? If
it's not a bug in libc, then I'm confused as to where
the bug is.
Or, are you referring to the issue of permissions for
pt_chown ? I agree it's a vendor issue, but I don't
want pt_chown ever getting called, because /dev/ptmx
*is* available and the PTS (/dev/pts/XX) would be
owned by the effective uid - hence there's no need for
grantpt() to call pt_chown. Perms. to pt_chown is a
different issue altogether.
Would greatly appreciate a response.
--- address@hidden wrote: > Synopsis: [BUG] getpt()
does not detect /dev/pts due
> to wrong statfs()
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: drepper
> State-Changed-When: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:24:57 -0400
> Report this to your vendor. This does not belong
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- Re: libc/5055,
Sreeji K Das <=
- Prev by Date:
- Next by Date:
- Previous by thread:
- Next by thread: