[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dinkumware test of glibc

From: Andreas Jaeger
Subject: Re: dinkumware test of glibc
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:30:20 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux)

Xose Vazquez Perez <address@hidden> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Xose Vazquez Perez <address@hidden> writes:
>>>dinkumware folks have found several bugs(who knows) in glibc
>>>with 'Dinkum Quick Proofer'(close source and $$):
>>>more info at http://www.dinkumware.com/conform_c.html#glibc230_results
>> Can you generate self contained testcases from this?  Without
>> testcases we cannot do much ourselves...
>> Andreas
> sorry, I only send a test summary to glibc-bugs
> because I don't have 'Dinkum Quick Proofer' product.
> All info that I have is from :
> http://www.dinkumware.com/conform_c.html
> http://www.dinkumware.com/conform_cpp.html
> I found Dinkunware test from a C/C++ Users Journal article
> about C++ Compiler Conformance Roundup
> http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=8193/cuj0104sutter/
> Maybe you can get more information from Dinkumware guys(P.J. Plauger)

I guess only for money - and I'm not going to pay them.

From the description in the report, we've fixed now the cases in glibc
that I was able to deduce but there're some where I really need a
testcase and don't have the time to do it myself.  Perhaps you can
think of how to create a testcase to show the problem?

 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs address@hidden
   private address@hidden

Attachment: pgpkD0fsbEdMx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]