[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: operation of 'round' function. Why does it matter?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: operation of 'round' function. Why does it matter? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:42:42 +0200 (IST) |
> From: David Kastrup <David.Kastrup@t-online.de>
> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
> Date: 11 Feb 2002 22:38:57 +0100
>
> > I've only very rarely used floating point numbers, but I think the
> > best thing to write into the documentation string for round would be
> > along the lines "... if the fractional part of a number is exactly
> > 0.5, whether it will be rounded up or down is implementation
> > dependent."
>
> Finally something with which I find myself able to agree.
A change to this effect was introduced into the development sources a
couple of days ago.
- Re: operation of 'round' function, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: operation of 'round' function, Deepak Goel, 2002/02/07
- Re: operation of 'round' function, David Masterson, 2002/02/07
- Re: operation of 'round' function, Deepak Goel, 2002/02/08
- Re: operation of 'round' function. Why does it matter?, Alan Mackenzie, 2002/02/09
- Re: operation of 'round' function. Why does it matter?, David Kastrup, 2002/02/09
- Re: operation of 'round' function. Why does it matter?, Alan Mackenzie, 2002/02/10
- Re: operation of 'round' function. Why does it matter?, David Kastrup, 2002/02/11
- Re: operation of 'round' function. Why does it matter?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: operation of 'round' function, David Kastrup, 2002/02/07
- Re: operation of 'round' function, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/02/07
Re: operation of 'round' function, maierh, 2002/02/07
Re: operation of 'round' function, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/08
Message not available