[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:05:17 -0800 |
> > This is not (necessarily) about partial completion. The new
> > feature is that a list of completion methods is used, in
> > order, to try to complete user input. That list is the
> > value of `completion-styles', which by default is `(basic
> > partial-completion)'.
>
> I think we should replace `partial-completion' in the default
> value of `completion-styles' with a new completion method, e.g.
> `confirm-partial-completion'.
Providing `confirm-partial-completion' as another alternative completion style
is fine, but why make it the default behavior? What's wrong with the traditional
behavior as default?
bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Drew Adams, 2009/01/06
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/06
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Drew Adams, 2009/01/07
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/07
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Drew Adams, 2009/01/07
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Drew Adams, 2009/01/07
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/07
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/07
bug#1800: 23.0.60; Changed meaning of * in buffer name completion, Richard M Stallman, 2009/01/06