[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jun 2013 16:25:50 +0200 |
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> wrote:
> If you can make it detect when to use macros and when to use functions so
> -O0 doesn't suffer, that is starting the ball rolling. Otherwise it is
> setting up
> a brick wall for users/developers with older gcc.
Also, in some environments updating to newer GCC isn't that easy.
There's no MinGW GCC 4.8.1, and I wouldn't bet there will be one for
many months.
J
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, (continued)
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/13
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/15
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/17
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Jan Djärv, 2013/06/09
bug#11935: XINT etc. should be functions, Barry OReilly, 2013/06/10