[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 11:26:15 -0200 |
I didn't notice anything as aggravating as the report, but I agree my
latest patch is a performance concern.
The proposed patch looks good, just a couple of notes:
1. I'd use RELOAD for the name of the optional argument.
2. Since this function now takes a second (somewhat non-trivial
argument), we should add a docstring to it:
"Activate package given by PKG-DESC, even if it was already active.
If RELOAD is non-nil, also `load' any files inside the package which
correspond to previously loaded files (those returned by
`package--list-loaded-files').
This is called internally by `package-activate'."
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/15
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow,
Artur Malabarba <=
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/16
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Artur Malabarba, 2014/12/17
- bug#19390: 25.0.50; `package-activate' is too slow, Dmitry Gutov, 2014/12/16