bug#12643: 24.2.50; TRAMP and ps-spool functions

[Michael Albinus]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> > What is so special about this buffer that it wouldn't make sense to
>> > store it somewhere remote?
>> 
>> Well, it's meant to be printed.
>
> Not necessarily.  Typing "M-x ps-print-buffer RET" _would_ indeed
> indicate that you want to print.  But if the user invokes
> ps-spool-buffer, she might well mean to save it in a file and print it
> elsewhere, or do something entirely different that doesn't involve
> printing.

This bug report stays open for years. I believe everything is said, and
there's no bug or missing feature. If nobody complaints, I'll close it
next days.

Best regards, Michael.