[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".
|
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
|
Subject: |
bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@". |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:00:37 -0500 |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
> "Read syntax" tends to distract attention from the semantics, I think.
I don't quite agree about that, but I think what you've committed is
perfectly fine, and there's not much to be gained by arguing the point
any further.
- bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., (continued)
- bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/19
- bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Michael Heerdegen, 2017/01/19
- bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/20
- bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Michael Heerdegen, 2017/01/20
- bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/21
- bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/21
- bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Michael Heerdegen, 2017/01/23
- bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/24
- bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., npostavs, 2017/01/23
- bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/24
- bug#25461: [Patch #2]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".,
Noam Postavsky <=
- bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@"., Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/23