[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2018 21:10:56 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, behdad@behdad.org, 33748@debbugs.gnu.org,
> far.nasiri.m@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 12:50:59 -0500
>
> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>
> >> Which oldest version of HarfBuzz would you prefer us to require? Is
> >> 0.9.42 OK, or do we need a newer one?
> >
> > I'd prefer the latest version of course, there have been lots of bug
> > fixes and new features since then.
>
> Right, but that doesn't answer the question.
I think it does:
> If one is building his own HarfBuzz,
> then definitely the latest version, otherwise the one that comes with
> the system is good enough (Emacs wouldn’t be disadvantaged anymore than
> any HarfBuzz-using application on the said system), as long as it has
> the APIs we use.
The last part, in my interpretation, means 0.9.42 is "good enough",
since it has the APIs used by the code.
- bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile, (continued)
bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile, Khaled Hosny, 2018/12/14
bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile, Khaled Hosny, 2018/12/15
bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile, Glenn Morris, 2018/12/15
bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile,
Eli Zaretskii <=
bug#33748: 27.0.50; harfbuzz branch fails to compile, Glenn Morris, 2018/12/17