[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emac
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:05:07 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hello, Eli.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 21:23:45 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:55:05 +0000
> > Cc: linux.xhyang@gmail.com, 33784@debbugs.gnu.org
> > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> > The current strategy is silently to ignore (font-lock-mode) when the
> > buffer name begins with a space. It feels to me like an easy to
> > implement, but suboptimal, workaround to a real problem, whatever that
> > real problem might be.
> The real problem is probably performance. But that's a guess; someone
> will have to do the forensics to find out which change did that, and
> then try to find related bug reports and/or discussions.
Hah! The change, not to fontify buffers with names beginning with
spaces, was made by Simon Marshall on 1995-12-09. The list archives only
go back to 2000. :-(
I suspect what happened was that back last millenium, there was a strong
convention for what a buffer with a name beginning with a space meant,
and it was perfectly OK then not to fontify such a buffer. Over time,
that convention became diluted such that even buffers created by users
(e.g. by with-temp-buffer) get names starting with a space. But that's
only a guess.
Maybe the solution would be not to start with-temp-buffer names with a
space.
Indeed page "Buffer Names" in Elisp states "Buffers that are ephemeral
and generally uninteresting to the user have names starting with a
space", which is ambiguous - does a buffer have to be both ephemeral and
generally uninteresting, or will one of these properties do? Probably
the latter.
Maybe the documentation for with-temp-buffer should be amended to
recommend Lisp programmers not to use it for buffers holding user text.
Or something like that.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, xh yang, 2018/12/17
- Message not available
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, Alan Mackenzie, 2018/12/18
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/12/18
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, Alan Mackenzie, 2018/12/18
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/12/18
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, Glenn Morris, 2018/12/18
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, Alan Mackenzie, 2018/12/19
- bug#33784: 27.0.50; some case c-backward-token-2 takes cpu more and emacs hang, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/12/19
bug#33784:, xh yang, 2018/12/20