[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36434: 26.2; smie-rule-next-p needs smie--after to be defined
From: |
Sam Halliday |
Subject: |
bug#36434: 26.2; smie-rule-next-p needs smie--after to be defined |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:23:01 +0100 |
When writing SMIE indentation rules, as per `smie-rules-function`,
when an :elem is received (confirmed at least with 'empty-line-token)
it is not possible to call the function smie-rule-parent-p, because
the smie--after variable has not been defined.
A workaround is to define the variable locally, e.g.
(defvar smie--after)
(setq smie--after (point))
- bug#36434: 26.2; smie-rule-next-p needs smie--after to be defined,
Sam Halliday <=