bug#29420: 26.0; doc of `list-packages'

[Stefan Kangas]

tags 29420 + patch
quit

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> > `C-h r g package menu' should give you a better description.
>> > It should describe each column of the display.
>>
>> It does that already.
>
> It does, but the next sentence details the problem
> with that description: nothing about `dependency',
> for example (dunno whether there are other problems
> with the columns description).
>
>> > It could describe column `status' better, for instance.  Apparently
>> > one of the possible values is `dependency', but that is not
>> > mentioned.
>>
>> Patches to improve the documentation of package.el in the manual are
>> most welcome.  I generally find its documentation inadequate and
>> outdated, and tried to improve that as best I could, but I don't know
>> enough about it to do a better job, and apparently (and sadly) no one
>> else is interested.
>
> I know (and likely care) less about the package system
> than you.  Neither of us is well placed, probably, to
> help much in this regard.
>
> I do appreciate your attempts to solicit strong doc
> along with new developments.  The package system
> slipped between the cracks to some extent in this
> regard, I guessed.  A guess is that when a large
> set of code gets developed outside Emacs first
> it can get added to Emacs all at once, and the doc
> isn't necessarily gone over with a fine-tooth comb,
> in spite of your best efforts.
>
> I agree that it would be great if Someone (TM) gave
> the package.el doc some more attention.

Please see the attached patch which extends the documentation to cover
all possible package statuses.  Any comments?

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

0001-Document-package-statuses-better.patch
Description: Binary data