[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#37892: 27.0.50; Crash when signaling a thread
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#37892: 27.0.50; Crash when signaling a thread |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:58:58 +0300 |
> From: Michał Krzywkowski <mkrzywkow@gmail.com>
> Cc: Michał Krzywkowski <mkrzywkow@gmail.com>,
> 37892@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 14:29:43 +0200
>
> Eli> Emacs doesn't allow signals while it waits for input.
>
> Eli> We could ignore thread-signal in such cases, or we could make it an
> Eli> error (which will then signal an error in the thread which called
> Eli> thread-signal). What do people think? Are there any other ideas for
> Eli> handling this situation?
>
> Maybe the signal should be raised in the thread right after it returns
> from sit-for?
We don't have any mechanism for doing that.
> Ignoring signals sounds like a bad idea.
It is better than crashing. It is also not much worse than
interrupting the thread at some arbitrary random point.
> Eli> Michał, can you tell why you needed to call thread-signal while the
> Eli> thread was in sit-for?
>
> I wanted to signal some background thread which was doing some work and
> then Emacs crashed, because it just so happened that it was in sit-for.
> The thread function was doing _more_ than just sit-for.
>
> I actually don't care (and can't know) what another thread is doing, I
> just want to send a signal to it.
But thread-signal is not for causing an error in a thread, it is for
unblocking a thread that waits on a mutex or a condvar. So why would
you use it when the thread is not blocked?