bug#41659: 28.0.50; smime: encryption uses now base64, message not readable

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "LI" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
>> In principle, but I also think users don't use smime that much, because
>> the setup is as you said, cumbersome. I just thought documentation could
>> help in the meantime (recall that I reported the smime bug, err August
>> last year).

> I've been, like, away.  :-/

I am glad  you are back. ;-)


> Better documentation is also welcome, of course.

I'll think about it. Your solution is of course much better.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature