[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting
From: |
Roland Winkler |
Subject: |
bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:20:49 -0600 |
On Mon Dec 7 2020 Francesco Potortì wrote:
> Ah, I forgot.
>
> I did not include it in the patch, but I think that
> bibtex-autokey-get-field should be renamed to bibtex-get-field
I'll look into this patch.
(I believe bibtex-autokey-get-field need not be renamed.
But it will be better to call instead the low-level function
bibtex-text-in-field.)
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Francesco Potortì, 2020/12/06
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/12/07
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Francesco Potortì, 2020/12/07
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting,
Roland Winkler <=
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Francesco Potortì, 2020/12/09
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Roland Winkler, 2020/12/12
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Francesco Potortì, 2020/12/13
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Roland Winkler, 2020/12/18
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Francesco Potortì, 2020/12/18
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Roland Winkler, 2020/12/19
- bug#44597: 26.3; bibtex should allow reverse sorting, Francesco Potortì, 2020/12/19