[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45178: buffer-hash docstring should explain difference to secure-has
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#45178: buffer-hash docstring should explain difference to secure-hash |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:19:16 -0600 |
close 45178 28.1
thanks
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
>
>> I guess what I don't understand is why I would _ever_ want to use this
>> function. I mean, why not just compare buffers using `secure-hash'?
>
> `buffer-hash' is fast, so you can use it to compare the buffer contents
> before and after doing things like `indent-sexp' to see whether that
> changed anything.
OK, I've benchmarked this and can confirm it is indeed much faster. So
I updated its docstring on master by copying the explanation from the
manual. I'm therefore closing this bug report.