bug#45177: 27.1; Access to invoking top level command in minibuffer

[clemera]

> Hm...  I'm not quite sure "the top level command" is a well-defined
> concept?  You can enter a number of nested recursive edits, and I think
> what you probably want is the innermost command that invoked a recursive
> edit?

Yes, that would be ideal.

> So perhaps it would make sense for Frecursive_edit (or some other handy
> function when entering the minibuffer) to let-bind a new variable (say,
> `this-recursive-command'?) to the value of `real-this-command'?

I don't know anything about the C side of Emacs so I can't be of any 
help here.